Responses to "Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning" by Santelices & Wilson

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 - 10:09am

In reaction to the Santelices & Wilson (2010) article on the analysis of DIF effects used in development of the SAT the College Board has published a statement criticizing the original article on its web site.

 
Santelices & Wilson have made available their response to the College Board criticisms, reiterating the conclusions of their original paper.
 
College Board Response: Read the College Board Response.
 
Response to the College Board by Santelices & Wilson: Read Santelices & Wilson Response.
 

 

References:

Dorans, N. J. (2010). Misrepresentations in Unfair Treatment by Santelices and Wilson. Harvard Educational Review, 80(3), 404–413. 
Santelices, M. V., & Wilson, M. (2010a). Responding to Claims of Misrepresentation. Harvard Educational Review, 80(3), 413–417. 
Santelices, M. V., & Wilson, M. (2010b). Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 106–134.