Biblio

Export 211 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
Wilson, M., Bejar, I., Scalise, K., Templin, J., Wiliam, D., & Torres Irribarra, D.. (2012). Perspectives on Methodological Issues. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 67–141). Springer.
Wilson, M., & Adams, R. J.. (1996). Evaluating progress with alternative assessments: A model for Chapter 1. In M. B. Kane (Ed.), Implementing performance assessment: Promise, problems and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wilson, M., & Draney, K.. (1996, April). Mapping student progress with embedded assessments. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Wilson, M., & Xie, Y.. (2004). The Imperial vs Metric Study. University of California, Berkeley.
Wilson, M., Roberts, L., Samson, S., & Sloane, K.. (2000). SEPUP Assessment Resources Handbook (No. BEAR Report Series). University of California, Berkeley.
Wilson, M., & Draney, K.. (1997, March). Developing maps for student progress in the SEPUP assessment system. Presented at the ninth International Objective Measurement Workshop, Chicago, IL.
X
Xie, Y. (2001). Dimensionality, Dependence, or Both?: An Application of the Item Bundle Model to Multidimensional Data. Position Paper; Policy, Organization, Measurement, & Evaluation; Graduate School of Education; University of California, Berkeley.
Xie, Y. (2002). An Application of a Special Two-Class Item Response Model Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method. Position Paper; Policy, Organization, Measurement, & Evaluation; Graduate School of Education; University of California, Berkeley.
Y
Yamada, H., Draney, K., Karelitz, T. M., Moore, S., & Wilson, M.. (2006, April). Comparison of dimension-aligning techniques in a multidimensional IRT context. Presented at the 13th International Objective Measurement Workshops, Berkeley, CA.

Pages