Biblio
. (2004). The Imperial vs Metric Study. University of California, Berkeley.
. (2004). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. New York: Routledge Academic.
. (2000). SEPUP Assessment Resources Handbook (No. BEAR Report Series). University of California, Berkeley.
. (1997, March). Developing maps for student progress in the SEPUP assessment system. Presented at the ninth International Objective Measurement Workshop, Chicago, IL.
. (2005). Systems for State Science Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
(473.17 KB). (2011). Validating a learning progression in mathematical functions for college readiness. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 259–291.
(1.22 MB). (1993, April). Comparing multiple-choice and performance-based items. Presented at the Seventh International Objective Measurement Workshop, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
. (2006). Modeling Randomness in Judging Rating Scales with a Random-Effects Rating Scale Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 335–353.
(151.54 KB). (1993, March). Comparing multiple-choice and performance-based items. Presented at the California Learning Assessment System Technical Advisory Committee meeting. San Francisco, CA.
. (2014, 04/2014). The Berkeley Assessment System Software: Facilitating Teacher Management of Assessment. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop 20014, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
. (2014, 04/2014). Modeling for directly mapping construct levels. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop 20014, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
. (2013). An analysis of Cross Racial Identity Scale scores using classical test theory and Rasch item response models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46, 136–153.
. (1996). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice. University of California, Berkeley.
(108.2 KB). (1996, April). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
. (1997, July). Innovative approach to program evaluation in science education. Presented at the sixth National Evaluation Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
. (2013, April 28). Using a Learning Progressions Framework to Develop a Classroom Assessment System That Is Inclusive of Students With Learning Disabilities in Mathematics: Results From Pilot 2. (). Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
. (2012, April 14). Diagnostic Learning Progressions Framework—Developing a Universally Designed Classroom Assessment System That Is Inclusive of Students With Mathematics Learning Disabilities: Our First Pilot Study. (). Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Vancouver, BC.
. (2011). The nature of assessment systems to support effective use of evidence through technology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8, 121–132.
. (2006, April). Assessment for e-Learning: Case studies of an emerging field. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, Berkeley, CA.
. (2011). The Nature of Assessment Systems to Support Effective Use of Evidence through Technology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8, 121–132.
(372.94 KB). (2004). Perspectives of Chemists: Tracking conceptual understanding of student learning in chemistry at the secondary and university levels. Enhancing the Visibility and Credibility of Educational Research, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
. (2010). Improving assessment evidence in e-learning products: some solutions for reliability. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5, 191–208.
(867.24 KB). (2007). Adaptive technology for e-learning: principles and case studies of an emerging field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2295–2309.
(691.68 KB). (2006). ChemQuery: An assessment system for mapping student progress in learning chemistry. STEM Assessment Conference.
. (2012). On the Relationship Between Differential Item Functioning and Item Difficulty An Issue of Methods? Item Response Theory Approach to Differential Item Functioning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 5–36.
(334.82 KB)