Biblio
. (2009). Formative Assessment Delivery System (FADS).
. (1996, April). What have we learned from developing an embedded assessment system?. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
. (2012). Responding To A Challenge That Learning Progressions Pose To Measurement Practice. In Learning progressions in science (pp. 317–343). Springer.
(2.43 MB). (2013). Using the concept of a measurement system to characterize measurement models used in psychometrics. Measurement, 46, 3766–3774.
(1.23 MB). (2003). On Choosing a Model for Measuring. Methods of Psychological Research.
. (2011). Validating a learning progression in mathematical functions for college readiness. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 259–291.
(1.22 MB). (1993, April). Comparing multiple-choice and performance-based items. Presented at the Seventh International Objective Measurement Workshop, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
. (2006). Modeling Randomness in Judging Rating Scales with a Random-Effects Rating Scale Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 335–353.
(151.54 KB). (1993, March). Comparing multiple-choice and performance-based items. Presented at the California Learning Assessment System Technical Advisory Committee meeting. San Francisco, CA.
. (2014, 04/2014). Modeling for directly mapping construct levels. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop 20014, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
. (2014, 04/2014). The Berkeley Assessment System Software: Facilitating Teacher Management of Assessment. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop 20014, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
. (2013). An analysis of Cross Racial Identity Scale scores using classical test theory and Rasch item response models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46, 136–153.
. (1997, July). Innovative approach to program evaluation in science education. Presented at the sixth National Evaluation Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
. (1996). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice. University of California, Berkeley.
(108.2 KB). (1996, April). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
. (2012, April 14). Diagnostic Learning Progressions Framework—Developing a Universally Designed Classroom Assessment System That Is Inclusive of Students With Mathematics Learning Disabilities: Our First Pilot Study. (). Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Vancouver, BC.
. (2013, April 28). Using a Learning Progressions Framework to Develop a Classroom Assessment System That Is Inclusive of Students With Learning Disabilities in Mathematics: Results From Pilot 2. (). Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
. (2006). ChemQuery: An assessment system for mapping student progress in learning chemistry. STEM Assessment Conference.
. (2011). The nature of assessment systems to support effective use of evidence through technology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8, 121–132.
. (2006, April). Assessment for e-Learning: Case studies of an emerging field. Presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, Berkeley, CA.
. (2011). The Nature of Assessment Systems to Support Effective Use of Evidence through Technology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8, 121–132.
(372.94 KB). (2004). Perspectives of Chemists: Tracking conceptual understanding of student learning in chemistry at the secondary and university levels. Enhancing the Visibility and Credibility of Educational Research, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
. (2010). Improving assessment evidence in e-learning products: some solutions for reliability. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5, 191–208.
(867.24 KB). (2007). Adaptive technology for e-learning: principles and case studies of an emerging field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2295–2309.
(691.68 KB). (2010). Unfair treatment? The case of Freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to differential item functioning. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 106–134.
(257.42 KB)